Selektor v. Smiles Parking Co.

210 A.D.2d 18, 618 N.Y.S.2d 813
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered on or about May 7, 1993, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the absence of any evidence that defendants had experience with or knowledge of criminal activity inside or in the direct vicinity of the parking lot, the IAS Court correctly concluded that decedent’s murder inside the parking lot was not reasonably foreseeable and hence defendants had no duty to provide protective measures (compare, Jacqueline S. v City of New York, 81 NY2d 288, 295). Since summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted, the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint was rendered moot. Concur —Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selektor v. Smiles Parking Co., 210 A.D.2d 18, 618 N.Y.S.2d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 18 (Selektor v. Smiles Parking Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monk v. Temple George Associates, LLC
869 A.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Monk v. Temple George Associates, LLC
846 A.2d 933 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2004)
Fernandez v. Staples, Inc.
261 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)