Selective Insurance Company of v. Target Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided January 25, 2017·No. 16-1669·Published

Opinion

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

No. 16‐1669 SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant‐Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 13‐cv‐5910 — Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge.

Before FLAUM and KANNE, Circuit Judges, and MAGNUS‐ STINSON, District Judge.

ORDER

The opinion issued in the above‐entitled case on Decem‐ ber 29, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:

 Of the Southern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.

2 No. 16‐1669

On page 4, at lines 23 and 28, the year “2001”1 is replaced with “2007,” such that the date referenced in both lines is “April 2007.”

On page 7, at line 26, the word “eight” is replaced with “two,” such that the sentence reads as follows: “One of those future agreements was the Program Agreement executed by Target and Harbor two years after the Supplier Agreement.”

On page 8, at line 6 of footnote 1, the word “eight” is re‐ placed with “two,” such that the sentence reads as follows: “Selective’s position ignores the reality that the two contracts were executed two years apart and were not one contract.”

1 The erroneous date included in the previously‐issued opinion was taken

from the photocopied first page of the Supplier Agreement, which appears to reference April 2001. See Appellant’s Supplemental Appendix at A50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selective Insurance Company of v. Target Corporation, (7th Cir. 2017).

Selective Insurance Company of v. Target Corporation (Selective Insurance Company of v. Target Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.