Selectile Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Selectile Co. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 878, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1904

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Selectile Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Cust. Ct. 30 →

United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1967·No. No. P67/95; protest 60/10340(B) (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of polished marble slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Selectile Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 30, C.D. 2504), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Bao, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of polished marble slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Selectile Co., Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 30, C.D. 2504), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Bao, Judges.)

Selectile Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 878, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1904 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 878 (Selectile Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related