Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. v. Worobec
Opinion
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”), appeals the trial court’s June-6, 2014; order dismissing SPS’s foreclosure action against Robert Worobee and the trial court’s October 1, 2014, order denying SPS’s motion to vacate the order of dismissal. SPS’s complaint was filed in contravention of the automatic stay arising from Worobec’s earlier filing of a petition for bankruptcy.
Actions taken in violation of an automatic stay are “void and without effect” even where there is no actual notice of the stay. McMahon v. Ryan, 964 So.2d 198, 200 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (quoting Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Hall, 685 F.2d 1306, 1308 (11th Cir.1982)); see also Personalized Air Conditioning, Inc. v. C.M. Sys., Inc., 522 So.2d 465, 466 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of SPS’s action. Our affirmance is without prejudice to SPS filing a new foreclosure suit.1
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
178 So. 3d 971 (Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. v. Worobec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.