Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns

Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas

Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns

12 Pa. D. & C. 604, 1929 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 364

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

DecidedJanuary 5, 1929

DocketNo. 1740

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Pa. D. & C. 604 (Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Select Furniture Co. v. Kearns, 12 Pa. D. & C. 604, 1929 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 364 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Martin, J.,

This is an action of replevin. The defendant has filed a petition, praying that the goods in controversy be permitted to remain in his custody and possession pending the trial of the case. A rule to show cause was issued upon this petition. The reason assigned is that the defendant is unable to secure a counter-bond.

No authority has been cited to us which authorizes this procedure. If the action was improperly brought, the defendant has his remedy against the plaintiff and its surety on the replevin bond. The rule to show cause why the defendant should not retain custody of the property will be discharged.

Prom William J. Aiken, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, J.,

This is an action of replevin. The defendant has filed a petition, praying that the goods in controversy be permitted to remain in his custody and possession pending the trial of the case. A rule to show cause was issued upon this petition. The reason assigned is that the defendant is unable to secure a counter-bond.

No authority has been cited to us which authorizes this procedure. If the action was improperly brought, the defendant has his remedy against the plaintiff and its surety on the replevin bond. The rule to show cause why the defendant should not retain custody of the property will be discharged.

Prom William J. Aiken, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Pa. D. & C. 604, 1929 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/select-furniture-co-v-kearns-pactcomplallegh-1929.