Seldin v. Jupiter Cove Plaza, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seldin v. Jupiter Cove Plaza, Ltd.

571 So. 2d 52, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8970, 1990 WL 181845

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 28, 1990

DocketNo. 90-0270

StatusPublished

This text of 571 So. 2d 52 (Seldin v. Jupiter Cove Plaza, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seldin v. Jupiter Cove Plaza, Ltd., 571 So. 2d 52, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8970, 1990 WL 181845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt to appeal a non-final order which denied a Motion to Strike from Trial Docket and for Leave of Court to Amend Defendant’s Complaint to Add a Counterclaim and to Implead Third Party Defendant. Appellant relies on rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure to support his position that this court has jurisdiction in this matter. The subsection in question is to be strictly construed to apply only to orders that actually determine liability. Heritage Paper Co. v. Farah, 440 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). That is not the case here, nor does the order in question fall within any of the other classifications specified in rule 9.130(a)(3).

Thus, we are without jurisdiction and sua sponte dismiss this appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt to appeal a non-final order which denied a Motion to Strike from Trial Docket and for Leave of Court to Amend Defendant’s Complaint to Add a Counterclaim and to Implead Third Party Defendant. Appellant relies on rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure to support his position that this court has jurisdiction in this matter. The subsection in question is to be strictly construed to apply only to orders that actually determine liability. Heritage Paper Co. v. Farah, 440 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). That is not the case here, nor does the order in question fall within any of the other classifications specified in rule 9.130(a)(3).

Thus, we are without jurisdiction and sua sponte dismiss this appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 So. 2d 52, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8970, 1990 WL 181845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seldin-v-jupiter-cove-plaza-ltd-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack