Selderbeck v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Selderbeck v. Hartford Fire Insurance

258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8551

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 985 (Selderbeck v. Hartford Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selderbeck v. Hartford Fire Insurance, 258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Consolidated actions (1) by a conditional vendor to recover her insurable interest, and (2) by the named assureds in a policy of fire insurance to reform the policy to conform to the true agreement and to recover thereon. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in both actions after trial by the court without a jury. Judgment modified by adding thereto a decretal paragraph directing that the policy be reformed to conform to the true agreement made by the parties. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. A conclusion of law will be made to the same effect as the decretal paragraph directed to be added to the judgment. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Consolidated actions (1) by a conditional vendor to recover her insurable interest, and (2) by the named assureds in a policy of fire insurance to reform the policy to conform to the true agreement and to recover thereon. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in both actions after trial by the court without a jury. Judgment modified by adding thereto a decretal paragraph directing that the policy be reformed to conform to the true agreement made by the parties. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. A conclusion of law will be made to the same effect as the decretal paragraph directed to be added to the judgment. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 985, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selderbeck-v-hartford-fire-insurance-nyappdiv-1940.