Selden v. . Vermilya

New York Court of Appeals

Selden v. . Vermilya

1 N.Y. 534, 3 How. Pr. 338

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Selden v. . Vermilya. Read the opinion of the Court — 3 N.Y. 525 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 1848·Published

Opinion

Bronson,. J.

Although this suit was commenced prior to the first of July, yet as the order of the general term dissolving the injunction was made since that day, the right to appeal depends on the code of procedure. (Mayor of New- York v. Schermerhorn, ante, p. 423.) And it is quite clear that the code does not give an appeal in such a case. (§§ 282,11.)

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bronson,. J.

Although this suit was commenced prior to the first of July, yet as the order of the general term dissolving the injunction was made since that day, the right to appeal depends on the code of procedure. (Mayor of New- York v. Schermerhorn, ante, p. 423.) And it is quite clear that the code does not give an appeal in such a case. (§§ 282,11.)

Motion granted.

Selden v. . Vermilya, 1 N.Y. 534, 3 How. Pr. 338 (N.Y. 1848).

Pincite

1 N.Y. 534 (Selden v. . Vermilya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.