Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co.

140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 16, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only decree entered in this cause was an interlocutory decree for an injunction and an accounting, dated November 21, 1904. The entry in the clerk’s docket March 21, 1905, of the amount taxed as costs was-not a final decree and is not appealable. If the complainants abandon the accounting, or unduly delay it, the defendant may move for the entry of a final decree from which an appeal can be taken. The motion to dismiss the present appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co., 140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981 (2d Cir. 1905).

140 F. 989 (Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group
611 F.2d 296 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)