Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co.

Second Circuit

Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co.

140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 16, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 F. 989 (Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selchow v. Chaffee & Selchow Mfg. Co., 140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981 (2d Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only decree entered in this cause was an interlocutory decree for an injunction and an accounting, dated November 21, 1904. The entry in the clerk’s docket March 21, 1905, of the amount taxed as costs was-not a final decree and is not appealable. If the complainants abandon the accounting, or unduly delay it, the defendant may move for the entry of a final decree from which an appeal can be taken. The motion to dismiss the present appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The only decree entered in this cause was an interlocutory decree for an injunction and an accounting, dated November 21, 1904. The entry in the clerk’s docket March 21, 1905, of the amount taxed as costs was-not a final decree and is not appealable. If the complainants abandon the accounting, or unduly delay it, the defendant may move for the entry of a final decree from which an appeal can be taken. The motion to dismiss the present appeal is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selchow-v-chaffee-selchow-mfg-co-ca2-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack