Selby v. Watkins

Fourth Circuit

Selby v. Watkins

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20838, 1994 WL 263208

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1994

Docket94-6045

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1040 (Selby v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selby v. Watkins, 25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20838, 1994 WL 263208 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky Emanuel SELBY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Maggie WATKINS; Captain Asal; Officer McCroskey; Sergeant
Ratliff; Sergeant Davis; Lieutenant Mathena; Captain
Hintz; Susan Whittaker; Safety Staff Vann; Correctional
Officer Baldwin; Robert J. Beck; Awo Soldato; Sergeant
Gayheart, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-255-R).

Ricky Emanuel Selby, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Selby v. Watkins, No. CA-93-255-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricky Emanuel SELBY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Maggie WATKINS; Captain Asal; Officer McCroskey; Sergeant
Ratliff; Sergeant Davis; Lieutenant Mathena; Captain
Hintz; Susan Whittaker; Safety Staff Vann; Correctional
Officer Baldwin; Robert J. Beck; Awo Soldato; Sergeant
Gayheart, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6045.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-255-R).

Ricky Emanuel Selby, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Selby v. Watkins, No. CA-93-255-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1040, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20838, 1994 WL 263208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selby-v-watkins-ca4-1994.