Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008)

Oregon Tax Court

Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008)

DecidedAugust 26, 2008

DocketTC-MD 080546D.

StatusPublished

This text of Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008) (Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008), (Or. Super. Ct. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL On April 28, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Complaint challenging the assessment of property identified as Account 05007653. On May 13, 2008, Defendant filed its Answer. A case management conference was held on July 9, 2008. Plaintiff was instructed to file a status report with the court no later than July 31, 2008.

On August 4, 2008, court staff contacted Plaintiff concerning the overdue status report. Plaintiff stated that she did not want to pursue the appeal if it was necessary for Defendant to be in her home. Court staff requested that Plaintiff send a letter to the court if she intended to withdraw her appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a status report or withdrawn her *Page 2 appeal. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL On April 28, 2008, Plaintiff filed a Complaint challenging the assessment of property identified as Account 05007653. On May 13, 2008, Defendant filed its Answer. A case management conference was held on July 9, 2008. Plaintiff was instructed to file a status report with the court no later than July 31, 2008.

On August 4, 2008, court staff contacted Plaintiff concerning the overdue status report. Plaintiff stated that she did not want to pursue the appeal if it was necessary for Defendant to be in her home. Court staff requested that Plaintiff send a letter to the court if she intended to withdraw her appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a status report or withdrawn her *Page 2 appeal. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for want of prosecution. Now, therefore,

IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Selby v. Clackamas County Assessor, Tc-Md 080546d (or.tax 8-26-2008), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selby-v-clackamas-county-assessor-tc-md-080546d-ortax-8-26-2008-ortc-2008.