Selber v. Young

34 So. 95, 109 La. 1080, 1903 La. LEXIS 469
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 30, 1903·No. No. 14,621·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.

This suit was dismissed in the district court upon an exception of no cause of action. From the judgment so rendered, the plaintiff, upon May 6, 1902, took an appeal which was made returnable to this court “in thirty days.” Though no application was made for an extension of time, the transcript was not lodged here until November 3, 1902. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, and the motion must prevail. “Upon the failure of the appellant to file the transcript within the proper time, the appellee is entitled to have the appeal dismissed.” State ex rel. Ludham & Burnham v. Judge ad hoc, 104 La. 241, 28 South. 886; Mutual Loan & Building Association v. First African Baptist Church, 49 La. Ann. 880, 21 [1081]*1081South. 517; Id., 48 La. Ann. 1458, 21 South. 24; Hudson and husband v. Garrett, Sheriff, et als., 47 La. Ann. 1534, 18 South. 510.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selber v. Young, 34 So. 95, 109 La. 1080, 1903 La. LEXIS 469 (La. 1903).

34 So. 95 (Selber v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Henderson Sugar Refinery Co.
5 La. App. 663 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.
82 So. 384 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
52 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)