Selber v. Young

34 So. 95, 109 La. 1080, 1903 La. LEXIS 469
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 30, 1903
DocketNo. 14,621
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 So. 95 (Selber v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Selber v. Young, 34 So. 95, 109 La. 1080, 1903 La. LEXIS 469 (La. 1903).

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, J.

This suit was dismissed in the district court upon an exception of no cause of action. From the judgment so rendered, the plaintiff, upon May 6, 1902, took an appeal which was made returnable to this court “in thirty days.” Though no application was made for an extension of time, the transcript was not lodged here until November 3, 1902. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, and the motion must prevail. “Upon the failure of the appellant to file the transcript within the proper time, the appellee is entitled to have the appeal dismissed.” State ex rel. Ludham & Burnham v. Judge ad hoc, 104 La. 241, 28 South. 886; Mutual Loan & Building Association v. First African Baptist Church, 49 La. Ann. 880, 21 [1081]*1081South. 517; Id., 48 La. Ann. 1458, 21 South. 24; Hudson and husband v. Garrett, Sheriff, et als., 47 La. Ann. 1534, 18 South. 510.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. Henderson Sugar Refinery Co.
5 La. App. 663 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1927)
J. S. Terry Const. Co. v. James K. Sutherlin Co.
82 So. 384 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)
Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.
52 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 So. 95, 109 La. 1080, 1903 La. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/selber-v-young-la-1903.