Selak v. Murray Rubber Company
158 A. 544, 108 N.J.L. 548, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 257
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Selak v. Murray Rubber Company, 158 A. 544, 108 N.J.L. 548, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 257 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 544 (Selak v. Murray Rubber Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.