Sekove Sadria v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 456 F. App'x 673 (Sekove Sadria v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Sekove V. Sadria, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Sadria’s contention that his conviction for possession of a controlled substance qualified for treatment under the Federal First Offender Act, see generally Ramirez-Altamirano v. Holder, 563 F.3d 800, 806-08 (9th Cir. 2009), because it was not exhausted before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 F. App'x 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sekove-sadria-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.