Sekoh v. Sekoh

Fourth Circuit

Sekoh v. Sekoh

398 F. App'x 893

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2010·No. No. 10-1941·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Danny Jan Sekoh appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sekoh v. Sekoh, No. 5:10-cv-00251-D (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Danny Jan Sekoh appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sekoh v. Sekoh, No. 5:10-cv-00251-D (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sekoh v. Sekoh, 398 F. App'x 893 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

398 F. App'x 893 (Sekoh v. Sekoh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.