S.E.K. v. L.A.W.

Missouri Court of Appeals

S.E.K. v. L.A.W.

860 S.W.2d 398, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 7, 1993·No. No. 62867·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, S.E.K., by her Next Friend P.A.M., and P.A.M. individually, appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Perry County, Missouri, limiting past child support from respondent, L.A.W., to actual medical expenses proven at trial. We affirm.

The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). [399]*399A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, S.E.K., by her Next Friend P.A.M., and P.A.M. individually, appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Perry County, Missouri, limiting past child support from respondent, L.A.W., to actual medical expenses proven at trial. We affirm.

The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). [399]*399A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

S.E.K. v. L.A.W., 860 S.W.2d 398, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1392 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

860 S.W.2d 398 (S.E.K. v. L.A.W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.