Seivens v. McCall
1 Smith & H. 257
This text of 1 Smith & H. 257 (Seivens v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seivens v. McCall, 1 Smith & H. 257 (Ind. 1849).
Opinion
— “ The trial of the cause without any answer to the second plea was erroneous. Swan v. Rary, 2 Blackf. 291; Huston v. McPherson, 8 Blackf. 562. It was too late after the trial and judgment to file the replication.”
Judgment reversed, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Swan v. Rary
2 Blackf. 291 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1829)
Huston v. M'Pherson
8 Blackf. 562 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1847)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Smith & H. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seivens-v-mccall-ind-1849.