Seitz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seitz v. State

626 So. 2d 1124, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 1993 WL 495985

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1993·No. No. 92-3081·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellant, Gerald D. Seitz, and we find them to be without merit. We, thus, affirm his convictions and sentences. However, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same issue which we certified in Jones v. State, 619 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review granted, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla.1993); namely, whether the constitutional right to privacy renders unconstitutional that portion of section 800.-04, Florida Statutes which provides that consent is not a defense to a prosecution for sexual activity with a minor under age sixteen.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the issues raised by appellant, Gerald D. Seitz, and we find them to be without merit. We, thus, affirm his convictions and sentences. However, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same issue which we certified in Jones v. State, 619 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review granted, 629 So.2d 133 (Fla.1993); namely, whether the constitutional right to privacy renders unconstitutional that portion of section 800.-04, Florida Statutes which provides that consent is not a defense to a prosecution for sexual activity with a minor under age sixteen.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Seitz v. State, 626 So. 2d 1124, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 1993 WL 495985 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

626 So. 2d 1124 (Seitz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related