Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Seitz v. Seitz

Seitz v. Seitz

97 A.2d 152, 12 N.J. 368, 1953 N.J. LEXIS 254
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 25, 1953
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 A.2d 152 (Seitz v. Seitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seitz v. Seitz, 97 A.2d 152, 12 N.J. 368, 1953 N.J. LEXIS 254 (N.J. 1953).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 6.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.2d 152, 12 N.J. 368, 1953 N.J. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seitz-v-seitz-nj-1953.