Seitz v. Berg

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedMay 15, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294 (Seitz v. Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seitz v. Berg, 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

McAdam, Ch. J.

The action is for “ breach of a promise to marry,” and seduction is pleaded in aggravation of damages only (8 Barb. 323; 30 N. Y. 285). The [295]*295only civil action which can be founded on “ seduction” is by the parent or other person entitled to the female’s services to recover for them loss (26 Barb. 615; 11 N. Y. 343). The present action is not so brought, and is not for seduction in the sense in which that term is used in subdivision 3 of section 3228, of the Code in regard to costs. The recovery herein for the breach of promise being less than $50, it follows that that the defendant is entitled to a full bill of costs (Code, § 3228, § 3229, subd. 4).

Re-taxation ordered in accordance herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mulvehall v. . Millward
11 N.Y. 343 (New York Court of Appeals, 1854)
Kniffen v. . McConnell
30 N.Y. 285 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)
Hamilton v. Lomax
6 Abb. Pr. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Wells v. Padgett
8 Barb. 323 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seitz-v-berg-nynyccityct-1886.