Seitz v. Berg

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided May 15, 1886·Published

Opinion

McAdam, Ch. J.

The action is for “ breach of a promise to marry,” and seduction is pleaded in aggravation of damages only (8 Barb. 323; 30 N. Y. 285). The [295] only civil action which can be founded on “ seduction” is by the parent or other person entitled to the female’s services to recover for them loss (26 Barb. 615; 11 N. Y. 343). The present action is not so brought, and is not for seduction in the sense in which that term is used in subdivision 3 of section 3228, of the Code in regard to costs. The recovery herein for the breach of promise being less than $50, it follows that that the defendant is entitled to a full bill of costs (Code, § 3228, § 3229, subd. 4).

Re-taxation ordered in accordance herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seitz v. Berg, 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 294 (Seitz v. Berg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulvehall v. . Millward
11 N.Y. 343 (New York Court of Appeals, 1854)
Kniffen v. . McConnell
30 N.Y. 285 (New York Court of Appeals, 1864)
Hamilton v. Lomax
6 Abb. Pr. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Wells v. Padgett
8 Barb. 323 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)