Seisser v. Oregon Short Line Railroad

193 P. 731, 33 Idaho 291, 1920 Ida. LEXIS 47
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided November 17, 1920·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MORGAN, C. J.

This case was submitted to the district court on an agreed statement of facts, in lieu of evidence, and the following decision was rendered:

“JUDGMENT.

“The above-entitled matter having heretofore been taken under advisement for consideration and decision by the court; comes now the court and renders his decision, ánd orders judgment entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs, thereby dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.

“Judgment rendered December 31, 1917.

“F. J. COWEN, 'Judge.

“Filed December 31, 1917.”

[292]*292This is not a judgment, but an order for one, and is not appealable. (Santti v. Hartman, 29 Ida. 490, 161 Pac. 249, and eases therein cited.)

On authority of the cases above mentioned, this appeal is dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Rice and Budge, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seisser v. Oregon Short Line Railroad, 193 P. 731, 33 Idaho 291, 1920 Ida. LEXIS 47 (Idaho 1920).

193 P. 731 (Seisser v. Oregon Short Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heidemann v. Krueger
164 P.2d 591 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1945)
First Trust & Savings Bank v. Randall
63 P.2d 157 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1936)
Miller v. Gooding Highway District
30 P.2d 1074 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1934)