Seiniger v. Hoffacker
235 A.D. 638
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 638 (Seiniger v. Hoffacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seiniger v. Hoffacker, 235 A.D. 638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
"Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent upon the following grounds: (1) The proof does not show that defendants had obligated themselves to plaintiffs; (2) all the terms of a binding contract had not been arranged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seiniger-v-hoffacker-nyappdiv-1932.