Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

445 So. 2d 1055, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 7, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1172
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 445 So. 2d 1055 (Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co., 445 So. 2d 1055, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

BASKIN, Judge.

Treating appellants’ challenge to the trial court’s Order denying a motion to dissolve notice of lis pendens or to set bond as a petition for writ of certiorari, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c), we deny the writ. We hold that the supplementary proceedings alleging fraudulent conveyance of property were predicated upon a recorded judgment and duly recorded deeds and that the failure to establish the necessity for bond under Section 48.23(3), Florida Statutes (1981), or that lis pendens was inappropriate, precludes relief.

Petition for certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First S. Dev. v. Chandler & Assoc.
472 So. 2d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
445 So. 2d 1055, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seinfeld-v-commercial-bank-trust-co-fladistctapp-1984.