Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota

662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1995 WL 654483

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1995

DocketNo. 95-347

StatusPublished

This text of 662 So. 2d 436 (Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota, 662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1995 WL 654483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Angela Seijo appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. After careful consideration of the points raised by appellant, we find that the evidence is sufficient and no error of law has been shown. See Cardenas v. Office Depot, Inc., 619 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

The order is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Angela Seijo appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. After careful consideration of the points raised by appellant, we find that the evidence is sufficient and no error of law has been shown. See Cardenas v. Office Depot, Inc., 619 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

The order is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1995 WL 654483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seijo-v-cbm-industries-of-minnesota-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack