Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota
662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1995 WL 654483
Opinion
Angela Seijo appeals an order denying unemployment compensation benefits. After careful consideration of the points raised by appellant, we find that the evidence is sufficient and no error of law has been shown. See Cardenas v. Office Depot, Inc., 619 So.2d 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Wallace v. Zahn Dental Co., 618 So.2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc., 605 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
The order is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota, 662 So. 2d 436, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1995 WL 654483 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
662 So. 2d 436 (Seijo v. C.B.M. Industries of Minnesota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gonzalez v. Master Flowers, Inc.
605 So. 2d 180 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wallace v. ZAHN DENTAL COMPANY, INC.
618 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Cardenas v. Office Depot, Inc.
619 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)