Seigler v. Seigler
This text of 181 S.E. 822 (Seigler v. Seigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The record shows that a suit for divorce was made returnable to the July term, 1934, of the superior court, and a judgment for permanent alimony was rendered on June 27, 1934, between the parties in the divorce proceeding. The court was without jurisdiction to render a judgment for permanent alimony at or before the appearance term, and such jurisdiction could not be conferred by consent of the parties. Kantzipper v. Kantzipper, 179 Ga. 850 (177 S. E. 679).
2. The judgment for permanent alimony, being' void for lack of jurisdiction, could not be the basis of contempt proceedings against the defendant for failure to pay permanent alimony; and the court, not having [311]*311jurisdiction of the contempt’ proceedings, erred in not setting aside the rule nisi, and in adjudging the defendant in contempt.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 S.E. 822, 181 Ga. 310, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seigler-v-seigler-ga-1935.