Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Seidman v. Merchants Bank of New York

Seidman v. Merchants Bank of New York

243 A.D.2d 350, 665 N.Y.S.2d 507
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D.2d 350 (Seidman v. Merchants Bank of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seidman v. Merchants Bank of New York, 243 A.D.2d 350, 665 N.Y.S.2d 507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David Saxe, J.), entered on or about September 17, 1996, which granted intervention codefendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing intervenor’s complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Res judicata bars intervenor’s litigation of claims based on the same transaction involved in the prior appeal (214 AD2d 109), by which time intervener was a party to the action and in which she had a full and fair opportunity to raise the claims she now wants to press (see, Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 192, 194, n 3). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Russell Sage College
429 N.E.2d 746 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Seidman v. Merchants Bank
214 A.D.2d 109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D.2d 350, 665 N.Y.S.2d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidman-v-merchants-bank-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1997.