Home/New York Court of Appeals/Seidman v. M & R Air Conditioning Corp.

Seidman v. M & R Air Conditioning Corp.

205 N.E.2d 859, 15 N.Y.2d 814, 257 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1589
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 11, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 859 (Seidman v. M & R Air Conditioning Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seidman v. M & R Air Conditioning Corp., 205 N.E.2d 859, 15 N.Y.2d 814, 257 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1589 (N.Y. 1965).

Opinion

Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and complaint dismissed upon the ground that plaintiff’s failure to shut off the power on the air conditioning machine before attempting to replace the compressor belt was so careless as to amount to contributory negligence as a matter of law (Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Amsterdam Color Works, 284 App. Div. 376, affd. 308 N. Y. 816).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shorr v. Cohen Bros. Realty & Construction Corp.
490 N.E.2d 543 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Humphries v. Consolidated Edison Co.
314 F. Supp. 1052 (S.D. New York, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 859, 15 N.Y.2d 814, 257 N.Y.S.2d 935, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidman-v-m-r-air-conditioning-corp-ny-1965.