Seidl v. Seidl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seidl v. Seidl

272 A.D.2d 869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 869 (Seidl v. Seidl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seidl v. Seidl, 272 A.D.2d 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified, without costs, by directing a new trial of the issue of the custody of the child. The record is almost barren of testimony concerning that phase of the issue. The person [870]*870who should have the care and custody of the child and the living conditions of the parties should he inquired into. Such issues should be disposed of promptly. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Interlocutory judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified, without costs, by directing a new trial of the issue of the custody of the child. The record is almost barren of testimony concerning that phase of the issue. The person [870]*870who should have the care and custody of the child and the living conditions of the parties should he inquired into. Such issues should be disposed of promptly. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidl-v-seidl-nyappdiv-1947.