Seidenstriker v. Buffum
14 Pa. 158, 1850 Pa. LEXIS 188
Opinion
— This recognizance is within the rule of the conservative decisions. It is a note of the substance, from which a formal recognizance may be made up, and supports the plaintiff’s part of the issue, taken on the plea of nul tiel record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seidenstriker v. Buffum, 14 Pa. 158, 1850 Pa. LEXIS 188 (Pa. 1850).
14 Pa. 158 (Seidenstriker v. Buffum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Gould
48 Pa. Super. 528 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Winchester v. Rich
40 Pa. Super. 46 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)