Seidenstriker v. Buffum
14 Pa. 158, 1850 Pa. LEXIS 188
This text of 14 Pa. 158 (Seidenstriker v. Buffum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seidenstriker v. Buffum, 14 Pa. 158, 1850 Pa. LEXIS 188 (Pa. 1850).
Opinion
— This recognizance is within the rule of the conservative decisions. It is a note of the substance, from which a formal recognizance may be made up, and supports the plaintiff’s part of the issue, taken on the plea of nul tiel record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Gould
48 Pa. Super. 528 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)
Winchester v. Rich
40 Pa. Super. 46 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 Pa. 158, 1850 Pa. LEXIS 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidenstriker-v-buffum-pa-1850.