Seidenfried v. Ullman
123 N.Y.S. 2
This text of 123 N.Y.S. 2 (Seidenfried v. Ullman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seidenfried v. Ullman, 123 N.Y.S. 2 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
The sale and delivery of the goods was not defied at the trial. The defendant not alone failed to establish his defense of payment by a fair preponderance of the evidence, but there was not a scintilla of competent evidence tending to sustain it.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 N.Y.S. 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidenfried-v-ullman-nyappterm-1910.