Seidenberg v. Jeneroff
This text of 249 A.D. 685 (Seidenberg v. Jeneroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rensselaer county, for $4,149.51 damages and costs, entered apon a verdict of a jury in an action for negligence; also appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff was injured by a fall caused by the giving way of a defective railing of a porch in the rear of the second story of a building owned by the defendant, the second and third stories of which were occupied by plaintiff as tenant. The jury could have found that the porch was reserved for the common use of tenants of the building for the purpose of hanging out clothes on a clothesline attached to said porch and that it was thus used in common. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Heffeman, J., dissent on the authority of Kilmer v. White (254 N. Y. 64).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 685, 291 N.Y.S. 235, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidenberg-v-jeneroff-nyappdiv-1936.