Seidenberg v. Burwell
This text of 235 A.D. 745 (Seidenberg v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dated November 18, 1930, dismissing petitioners’ petition and alternative mandamus order, and order dated April 30, 1931, denying petitioners’ motion to vacate said order of November 18, 1930, unammously affirmed, with costs. The evidence justified the court below in directing the jury to find that no certificate to use the property for business purposes was issued. The use of the property for business purposes without a certificate of occupancy for such purpose was illegal. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidenberg-v-burwell-nyappdiv-1932.