Seideman v. City of New York
This text of 264 A.D. 359 (Seideman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order granting plaintiffs’ motion under section 292-a of the Civil Practice Act (Laws of 1941, chap. 929), to examine the defendant municipal corporation through one of the engineers in its department of docks, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the eya.mina.tion to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion.
Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion, with opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 359, 35 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seideman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1942.