Seidel v. Mills

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Seidel v. Mills

96 A. 899, 84 N.J. Eq. 507, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 399

DecidedJune 14, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 899 (Seidel v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seidel v. Mills, 96 A. 899, 84 N.J. Eq. 507, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 399 (N.J. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

'The decree of the court of chancery will be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

Some comment is made in the brief (there was no oral argument) as to certain features with respect to which it is claimed the court below misapprehended some of the facts. We find it unnecessary to consider this claim specifically, for, assuming it to be well founded, there is nothing in the case to impair in any way the correctness of the result reached.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams —14. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

'The decree of the court of chancery will be affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson.

Some comment is made in the brief (there was no oral argument) as to certain features with respect to which it is claimed the court below misapprehended some of the facts. We find it unnecessary to consider this claim specifically, for, assuming it to be well founded, there is nothing in the case to impair in any way the correctness of the result reached.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, White, Terhune, Heppenheimer, Williams —14. For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A. 899, 84 N.J. Eq. 507, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidel-v-mills-nj-1915.