Seidel v. Hollander
This text of 246 A.D. 233 (Seidel v. Hollander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assuming, without deciding, that plaintiff’s responsibility for the merchandise ceased upon shipment in this country, the defendant is nevertheless entitled to establish the condition of the merchandise on arrival in Europe, for the reason that such proof, if properly connected, will constitute some evidence of the condition of the merchandise at the time of shipment.
[234]*234The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted.
Present—Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 233, 285 N.Y.S. 233, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidel-v-hollander-nyappdiv-1936.