Seidel v. Atlantic City

96 A. 1102, 88 N.J.L. 737, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 1102 (Seidel v. Atlantic City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seidel v. Atlantic City, 96 A. 1102, 88 N.J.L. 737, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 272 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chaxcelloe, Chief Justice, Gareisox, Trenchaed, Bebgen, Black, Tebhune, Heppexhetaier, Williams, Tayloe, JJ. 10.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 1102, 88 N.J.L. 737, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seidel-v-atlantic-city-nj-1916.