Seibert v. Sebring

55 Pa. Super. 475, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 398
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 8, 1913·No. Appeal, No. 62·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

All that need be said in order to make clear the questions involved in this appeal and to vindicate the final decree is contained in the opinion of the learned president judge of the twenty-fifth judicial district, specially presiding, in which we all concur.

The decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant, and it is further ordered that the defendant be allowed a period of twenty days from the date of the decree of this court within which to perform that part of the decree which reads “to remove the said sign post and its said foundation, and also to dig out of the ground all concrete or other foundation matter used in establishing the said foundation, and to fill in the hole left [483] by the removal of said foundation and concrete With proper earth for sustaining sod,” and that that part of the decree relating to sodding be performed so soon thereafter as the weather will permit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seibert v. Sebring, 55 Pa. Super. 475, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 398 (Pa. Ct. App. 1913).

55 Pa. Super. 475 (Seibert v. Sebring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Philadelphia v. Street
63 Pa. D. & C.2d 709 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1974)
46 South 52nd Street Corp. v. Manlin
157 A.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Damulewicz v. Kozeniewski
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 264 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1957)
Chestnut Hill & Mt. Airy Business Men's Ass'n v. City of Philadelphia
87 Pa. D. & C. 209 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1954)
Breinig v. Allegheny County
2 A.2d 842 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Baldwin v. Conway
2 Pa. D. & C. 159 (Erie County Court Common Pleas, 1922)