Seibert v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seibert v. City of New York

118 A.D.2d 845, 500 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 A.D.2d 845 (Seibert v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seibert v. City of New York, 118 A.D.2d 845, 500 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful condemnation of the plaintiff Gerda Seibert’s property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.), dated June 7, 1984, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Order affirmed, with costs.

On the court’s own motion, the plaintiffs are hereby enjoined from instituting any further actions or proceedings in the courts of this State in relation to the City of New York’s 1970 condemnation of the plaintiff Gerda Seibert’s property and any matter related thereto (see, Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 AD2d 445, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 741; Sassower v Signorelli, 99 AD2d 358; Muka v New York State Bar Assn., 120 Misc 2d 897).

Special Term properly dismissed the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for wrongful condemnation of the plaintiff Gerda Seibert’s property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.), dated June 7, 1984, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Order affirmed, with costs.

On the court’s own motion, the plaintiffs are hereby enjoined from instituting any further actions or proceedings in the courts of this State in relation to the City of New York’s 1970 condemnation of the plaintiff Gerda Seibert’s property and any matter related thereto (see, Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 AD2d 445, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 741; Sassower v Signorelli, 99 AD2d 358; Muka v New York State Bar Assn., 120 Misc 2d 897).

Special Term properly dismissed the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Lazer, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 A.D.2d 845, 500 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seibert-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack