Seibert v. City of Evansville

144 N.E. 841, 195 Ind. 189, 1924 Ind. LEXIS 120
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 1924·No. No. 24,617.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellee sued appellant to recover a penalty for an alleged violation of a city ordinance, and recovered a judgment against him for $5 and costs. Such a suit is a civil action. Shea v. City of Muncie (1897), 148 Ind. 14, 33, 46 N. E. 138.

Where the amount in controversy in a civil action, exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed $50,’ no appeal will lie to the Supreme or Appellate Court unless the case presents for decision a question as to the validity of a franchise or ordinance, the constitutionality or proper construction of a statute, or rights guaranteed by the state or federal constitution. §§1389, 1391 Burns 1914, §1, Acts 1903 p. 280, §8, Acts 1901 p. 566.

No such question being presented by this appeal, it cannot be maintained. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seibert v. City of Evansville, 144 N.E. 841, 195 Ind. 189, 1924 Ind. LEXIS 120 (Ind. 1924).

144 N.E. 841 (Seibert v. City of Evansville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wirgau v. State
443 N.E.2d 327 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1982)
Biedinger v. City of East Chicago
154 N.E.2d 58 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1958)
Catherwood v. McIntyre
192 N.E. 109 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1934)