Seibert Cylinder Oil Cup Co. v. Phillips Lubricator Co.

10 F. 677, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2324
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
DecidedFebruary 23, 1882
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 F. 677 (Seibert Cylinder Oil Cup Co. v. Phillips Lubricator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seibert Cylinder Oil Cup Co. v. Phillips Lubricator Co., 10 F. 677, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2324 (circtdma 1882).

Opinion

Lowell, C. J.

The complainants are assignees of patent No. 138,-243, granted to John Gates for a very ingenious and useful lubricator for steam-engines. The defendants contend that one Parshall made the same invention a few weeks or a few months before Gates, though he took a patent some six years later. The evidence is not in a very satisfactory state, being a copy of that which was taken in a case of interference to which Gates was not a party. I have read it carefully, and do not find that Parshall completed and reduced to practice the invention in question before Gates made it. The idea was probably conceived by the two inventors nearly at the same time. Which was the earlier to conceive it I cannot say, but Gates fully tested and proved and adapted it to use while Parshall was trying to overcome a practical difficulty of construction which the particular form of his machine required him to overcome, and he did not succeed until years after Gates’ machine had been in general use.

The assignment to the plaintiffs was made an assignment, rather than a license, in order that they might sue in their own names — so the contracts recite; but there is no legal objection to this: the motivo is not material, and, the whole legal title being in the plaintiffs, they may maintain this suit without joining the patentees.

Decree for complainants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F. 677, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seibert-cylinder-oil-cup-co-v-phillips-lubricator-co-circtdma-1882.