Sehman v. Sehman

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2026
Docket1D2025-1381
StatusPublished

This text of Sehman v. Sehman (Sehman v. Sehman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sehman v. Sehman, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1381 _____________________________

YENTE LEEANN SEHMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT SEHMAN,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

January 14, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the matter had been called up for hearing and disposition, Petitioner had failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief).

ROWE, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Yente Leeann Sehman, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.
225 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sehman v. Sehman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sehman-v-sehman-fladistctapp-2026.