Sehman v. Sehman
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1381 _____________________________
YENTE LEEANN SEHMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT SEHMAN,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
January 14, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the matter had been called up for hearing and disposition, Petitioner had failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief).
ROWE, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Yente Leeann Sehman, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sehman v. Sehman (Sehman v. Sehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.