Sehman v. Sehman

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 2026·No. 1D2025-1381·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1381 _____________________________

YENTE LEEANN SEHMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT SEHMAN,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

January 14, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the matter had been called up for hearing and disposition, Petitioner had failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief).

ROWE, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Yente Leeann Sehman, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sehman v. Sehman, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Sehman v. Sehman (Sehman v. Sehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Nichols M. N. P.
225 So. 3d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)