Sehagal v. American Transit Insurance

178 Misc. 2d 407, 678 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 431
CourtCivil Court of the City of New York
DecidedJuly 30, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 178 Misc. 2d 407 (Sehagal v. American Transit Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Civil Court of the City of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sehagal v. American Transit Insurance, 178 Misc. 2d 407, 678 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 431 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard S. Greenbaum, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover for unpaid no-fault insurance medical benefits and legal fees. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment based upon the defendant’s failure to pay or deny the claims timely. Defendant claims that it timely requested verification and its time to comply was extended. This court notes that, contrary to plaintiffs argument, defendant had 10 business days from “receipt” of the claim to request verification (see, 11 NYCRR 65.15 [d] [1]). Plaintiff has submitted the date of mailing of the claim. Defendant has failed to show when it received the claim. The box, on [408]*408the denial form, with respect to the date the bill was received by the insurer is blank. The actual date of receipt is, in the first instance, knowledge within the defendant’s possession. Assuming five days for mailing from January 7, 1998, the defendant had until January 12, 1998 to pay or deny. The verification request was 11 business days after said date. Further, the defendant’s verification request sought information already provided to defendant. Such factors convince this court that the defendant’s time to pay or deny the claim was not extended. Therefore, defendant is precluded and summary judgment in plaintiffs favor is warranted (see, Presbyterian Hosp. v Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274).

Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted; summary judgment is hereby awarded to plaintiff in the sum of $3,837.78 with interest at the statutory rate of 2% from February 12, 1998 plus costs and disbursements; and plaintiffs attorneys are hereby awarded counsel fees at the statutory rate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.
683 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 Misc. 2d 407, 678 N.Y.S.2d 468, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sehagal-v-american-transit-insurance-nycivct-1998.