Segur v. Syndics of St. Maxent

1 Mart. 231
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Mart. 231 (Segur v. Syndics of St. Maxent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Segur v. Syndics of St. Maxent, 1 Mart. 231 (La. 1811).

Opinion

By the Court,

Martin, J. alone.

The land Was bought by St. Muxent, with the reservation of the king's right, to a certain part of it. According to the laws of the country, no suit was necessary to ascertain the royal portion. It was laid off according to the known rule and usage, and the governor’s construction is warranted by the cotemporaneous exposition of the word arpents, in grants and concessions of those days ; if superficial arpents were meant, it would have been necessary to have described the particular spot, with .more accuracy, than by saying, the ground on which the buildings stood. The decision [236]*236does not appear incorrect, and it was made by the only legitimate authority at the time, tho’ doubtless it was liable to the revision of the sovereign. The parties seem to have been satisfied therewith; and the plaintiff, having lost part of the purchased land, by a legal determination, is entitled to compensation.

Judgment for the Plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Renthorp v. Bourg
2 Mart. 97 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1816)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mart. 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segur-v-syndics-of-st-maxent-la-1811.