Seguin v. Barei

299 P. 655, 163 Wash. 702, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 702
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMay 26, 1931
DocketNo. 22346. Department Two.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 299 P. 655 (Seguin v. Barei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seguin v. Barei, 299 P. 655, 163 Wash. 702, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 702 (Wash. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

This action was brought by the appellant to set aside, as fraudulent, certain conveyances of real property made by Umberto Barei to Ernesto Barei. The appellant’s right to maintain the action depended upon an attachment which he had caused to be issued in a cause pending in the superior court for King county, entitled Seguin, as Receiver, etc., v. Plano et al., and which had been levied upon the property the conveyances of which are attacked in this action. The appellant claimed no other interest in the property.

The action in which the attachment was issued was tried and determined against the appellant, and upon appeal to this court the judgment was affirmed. Seguin v. Plano, 160 Wash. 421, 295 Pac. 179. The appellant’s petition for a rehearing on that appeal was denied on May 6, 1931, and the remittitur has gone down.

*703 The attachment upon which the appellant’s right to maintain the present action having been dissolved by the final determination of the principal action, the appellant no longer has any interest in the property, and hence the questions raised on this appeal have become moot. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 P. 655, 163 Wash. 702, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seguin-v-barei-wash-1931.