Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke
328 F.2d 965
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1964·No. No. 18835·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The record discloses no responsive pleading had been filed when this action was dismissed. Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is applicable. Cf. Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors Ass’n, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 787.
The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the action remanded with leave to plaintiffs to amend, if they so desire.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke, 328 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1964).
328 F.2d 965 (Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Segui v. O'Rourke
328 F.2d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)