Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke
328 F.2d 965
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 1964
DocketNo. 18835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 328 F.2d 965 (Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Segui ex rel. Ortiz v. O'Rourke, 328 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1964).
Opinion
The record discloses no responsive pleading had been filed when this action was dismissed. Rule 15(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is applicable. Cf. Breier v. Northern California Bowling Proprietors Ass’n, 9 Cir. 1963, 316 F.2d 787.
The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the action remanded with leave to plaintiffs to amend, if they so desire.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Segui v. O'Rourke
328 F.2d 965 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
328 F.2d 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segui-ex-rel-ortiz-v-orourke-ca9-1964.