Segourney v. Ingraham
21 F. Cas. 1024, 2 Wash. C. C. 336
This text of 21 F. Cas. 1024 (Segourney v. Ingraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Segourney v. Ingraham, 21 F. Cas. 1024, 2 Wash. C. C. 336 (circtdpa 1808).
Opinion
The writ is returned, and of course the plaintiff has obtained the effect of his motion. If the marshal has misconducted' himself in not having served the writ, or has made a false return, the plaintiff can take his remedy. But on the present rule, we have nothing further to do.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 F. Cas. 1024, 2 Wash. C. C. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segourney-v-ingraham-circtdpa-1808.