Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania/Segourney v. Ingraham

Segourney v. Ingraham

21 F. Cas. 1024, 2 Wash. C. C. 336
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1808·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

The writ is returned, and of course the plaintiff has obtained the effect of his motion. If the marshal has misconducted' himself in not having served the writ, or has made a false return, the plaintiff can take his remedy. But on the present rule, we have nothing further to do.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Segourney v. Ingraham, 21 F. Cas. 1024, 2 Wash. C. C. 336 (circtdpa 1808).

21 F. Cas. 1024 (Segourney v. Ingraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.