Sego v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Sego v. State

832 S.W.2d 855, 310 Ark. 380, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 510

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 20, 1992

DocketCR 92-764

StatusPublished

This text of 832 S.W.2d 855 (Sego v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sego v. State, 832 S.W.2d 855, 310 Ark. 380, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 510 (Ark. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Leslie Sego, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Joe Kelly Hardin, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Leslie Sego, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Joe Kelly Hardin, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

832 S.W.2d 855, 310 Ark. 380, 1992 Ark. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sego-v-state-ark-1992.