Seglie v. Ackerman
102 A. 1054, 91 N.J.L. 332, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 264
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kalisch in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seglie v. Ackerman, 102 A. 1054, 91 N.J.L. 332, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 264 (N.J. 1917).
102 A. 1054 (Seglie v. Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.