Seghers v. His Creditors

1 Mart. (N.S.) 453
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1823
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mart. (N.S.) 453 (Seghers v. His Creditors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seghers v. His Creditors, 1 Mart. (N.S.) 453 (La. 1823).

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. Desbois, one of the syndics of this estate, having become insolvent since his appointment, some of the creditors applied to the district court to call a meeting of the creditors to fill the vacancy, which it was alleged his failure had created. The syndics filed opposition to this, and the court, after argument, having rendered a decree that a meeting should take place for this purpose, they appealed.

We are of opinion the court did not err, and [454]*454that the creditors of an insolvent have a right to change syndics, who are but their mandataries, in case they make a cession of their goods. ipso jure se entiende ser revocado, quando despues de dado el mandatario se hace de deterior o peor condicion,—Curia Phil, lib. 2. chap. 11, no. 43, Fallidos.

East'n District. July, 1823. Hoffman for the plaintiff, Seghers for the defendants.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Mart. (N.S.) 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seghers-v-his-creditors-la-1823.