Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Segarra v. State

Segarra v. State

530 So. 2d 492, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3894, 1988 WL 90407
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 2, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1912
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 530 So. 2d 492 (Segarra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Segarra v. State, 530 So. 2d 492, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3894, 1988 WL 90407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The defendant challenges the revocation of his probation, claiming that there was insufficient evidence to establish a violation. We find his arguments unpersuasive. The written order of revocation fails, however, to indicate the grounds of Segarra’s probation violation although at the sentencing hearing the trial court made such a statement. Therefore, we affirm the revocation of the defendant’s probation but remand for the trial court to enter a proper written order corresponding with its oral pronouncement. Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jelks v. State
770 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cannon v. State
574 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Williams v. State
532 So. 2d 1301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 So. 2d 492, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3894, 1988 WL 90407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/segarra-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.